How Will the US Aid Freeze Affect Countries Around the World?

For decades, the United States has been the largest donor of foreign aid, supporting global initiatives in health, education, security, and humanitarian relief. However, with President Donald Trump's America First policy, the US State Department has frozen nearly all foreign aid for 90 days, with only emergency food programs and military aid to Israel and Egypt exempted. This decision has sent shockwaves through many countries relying on US assistance.

The Impact on Global Aid Programs

The US has been a major player in humanitarian aid, contributing over 40% of the United Nations' humanitarian budget. In 2023 alone, Washington distributed $72 billion in aid to nearly 180 countries. The freeze means that crucial programs providing clean water, healthcare, and education are now at risk. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which helps combat HIV and AIDS, is among the affected initiatives.

Another affected program is the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET), which helps predict food shortages. With the US system for monitoring global famine taken offline, humanitarian agencies are struggling to assess and respond to food crises, including the growing famine in Sudan.

Humanitarian Consequences

In Ukraine, the aid freeze has halted social programs supporting war veterans and their families. Organizations working on the ground report an inability to pay staff or continue operations. Similarly, in Myanmar, where ongoing military violence has left many displaced, the lack of funding has put lives at risk. Medical professionals are being let go, leaving vulnerable communities without essential healthcare services.

Despite a waiver allowing life-saving humanitarian assistance, many organizations face uncertainty. They struggle to determine if their programs qualify for exemptions and often lack clear communication on their status. Additionally, the layoffs of aid workers further complicate the distribution of assistance.

Political and Strategic Implications

The US government has long used foreign aid as a diplomatic tool to maintain influence in global affairs. By cutting assistance, Washington risks losing strategic leverage in regions like the Middle East and Africa. Countries that previously relied on US aid may turn to alternative sources of funding from China, the European Union, or private donors. However, these new partnerships may not fully replace the scale of support provided by the US.

The Road Ahead

With the freeze in place, humanitarian agencies are scrambling to secure alternative funding. Organizations are seeking support from faith-based groups, private donors, and international partners. However, without US assistance, many operations are expected to scale down, leaving millions in need.

The long-term effects of this decision remain uncertain. If the freeze continues beyond 90 days, the global humanitarian landscape may shift significantly, with lasting consequences for the US and its allies. Whether the US will resume its role as a leading donor or allow its influence to wane remains to be seen.